Thursday, September 29, 2011

A DETOUR TO NEW ENGLAND: NEW HAMPSHIRE

Bob and I happened to have a free companion fare plane ticket good for anywhere in the continental United States, and we happened to have a few free hotel rooms coming through Hotels.com, and these two things happened to be coinciding with our 32nd wedding anniversary, so . . .

We flew to New England.

Bob is obsessed with crossing things off his list: Fourteeners to climb, foods to eat, countries to visit, and states in the United States to at least put his foot in.  (He once drove to the Tennessee-Arkansas border after dropping Rachael and me off to tour Graceland just so he could say he'd been to Arkansas.)  Neither Bob nor I had been anywhere in New England, so that's where we went.  He could cross off three states AND a Canadian province in one blow!

We flew in to Manchester, New Hampshire. (Did you KNOW there was a Manchester, New Hampshire? I didn't.)  Our first stop was Canterbury, a Shaker-town-turned-tourist-site about an hour north of Manchester.

Back in the mid-19th century, about 300 Shakers lived and worked here. There are no Shakers left in this particular community, but the site has been wonderfully preserved and we had a very knowledgeable, enthusiastic (non-Shaker) guide who obviously had great respect for this community.

The building below is the church, with one door for the women and one for the men.  The Shakers believed in total celibacy, and they worshiped seated apart.
The Shakers had a wonderful outreach program for orphans, and when a new child arrived in the community, he or she was assigned to care for one of these trees, which gave the child both a responsibility and a sense of belonging:

The Shakers are known for their gardens and spices:

Behind the village are eight beautiful man-made ponds like this one:

The path leading from the village to the ponds:

Of course, we had to find some "native" food.  I wouldn't recommend either one of these drinks:

We also visited the New Hampshire state capital, Concord.  With a population of about 42,000 (just a little more than half the size of the city I currently live in), it has to be the smallest state capital I have ever visited.  It's amazing that it carries so much clout.
We did find a lovely church across the street from the State Capitol, St. Paul's Episcopal Church.  It was built in the 1800s, but gutted by an arsonist's fire in 1984.  The Gothic interior was replaced with more modern decor:


 Awesome lectern:

Beautiful, vibrant windows made by a local craftsman:


This painting and its window-like framing was my favorite thing about St. Paul's:

On our way north, we made a stop in Lebanon and scouted out the approximate site of the Smith family cabin in 1813, the year Joseph had his leg operated on.  The property, which now boasts a gas station and convenience store, was next to this beautiful section of the Connecticut River:
See Bob's post here for much more detail on the site.

Finally, we stopped in Hanover to take a quick look at Dartmouth College and check another one of the Ivies off another one of Bob's Lists. The smallest school in the Ivy League, it was charming and relatively peaceful the afternoon we were there:

More to come: Vermont, Montreal, and Maine.

5 comments:

  1. Once again, a very interesting post. I always enjoy your (and Bob's) travelogs. I had no idea Concord was that small, either! And that Lectern would liven up the meeting, wouldn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fun to see this post. Of course Dave always makes the observation that the strict celibacy laws are probably the main reason why the Shakers are no longer with us. But I love that idea of nurturing a tree!

    Glad you are able to check off more things off of your Life To Do Lists.

    E.

    ReplyDelete
  3. E., our guide actually addressed that issue of celibacy and said that is what everyone thinks, but the Shaker community thrived for decades until new laws prohibited adoption by religious groups. (They relied on adopting orphans to provide new members, and it sounds like life there for an adopted child was pretty idyllic. It's hard to imagine that the foster care system was a better alternative for homeless children.) Another important factor was industrialization and the general movement of population away from farms and to the cities. City life was not compatible with the Shaker style of simple living.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Chelsea and Jake (Jake worked at Dartmouth) lived in that part of the world, and we were lucky enough to visit. So beautiful! Next I want to cross seeing it in autumn off my list.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hmm.... August 1972....I was at Dartmouth College to give a talk, Pete was there (but had to leave before the talk), we went to church in Sharon, and the rest is history!! I enjoyed seeing the pictures and reading about your visit.

    ReplyDelete

http://www.bloggersentral.com/2012/11/pinterest-pin-it-button-on-image-hover.html